Was Buddha atheist? Was he against Sanatan?
Was Buddha atheist?
Was he against Sanatan?
Let's begin by addressing the first
question: Was Buddha an atheist? To clarify, let's first define what atheism
means in both modern and Vedic terms. In contemporary language, atheism refers
to a lack of belief in God. However, according to Vedic Shastras, an atheist is
someone who doesn't follow the teachings of the Vedas. In this sense, Buddha
can be considered an atheist because he did not believe in any God. However,
from the Vedic perspective, Buddha was not an atheist because he respected and
preached the words of the Vedas. Let's explore this in more detail.
So now the second question comes, was
Buddha against the Sanatan? And I also told that he followed the words of
Vedas. Then how did he follow? So let me tell you that.
If you think Hinduism and Buddhism as
different, it essentially means that you have not understood either of them.
Buddhism evolved out of an already existing framework of Indian spirituality
which the outsiders refer to as Hinduism. All the concepts of Karma, Nirvana,
Dharma, Sangha, Tantra, Asanga, Siddhi, Chitta, Ahamkara, Buddhi and many more
were already there before Gautama came along. He just gave a different
interpretation of many of these concepts.
The Tevijjā sutta, which talks about
the trayī-vidyā or the three knowledges (trayī-vidyā refers to the three vedas)
which the Buddha claimed to know better than the Brahmins, as well as the way
to brahmaloka or Nirvana. Buddha had understood Vedanta during his period most than anyone else. So
his philosophy seemed atheistic to Hindu priests So they called him atheist
which he was not because atheist is one who discards teaching of Vedas but
Buddha preached Vedas only.
Now let us take a look at Buddha’s
teachings:-
1.
Life involves
suffering, duhkha.
2.
Suffering is
caused by desire and grasping.
3.
There is a way
out of suffering.
4.
The way is the
“Noble Eightfold Path.”
Now lets see what Krishna says in
Bhagavad Gita
BG 8.15: “Having attained Me, the great souls
are no more subject to rebirth in this world, which is transient and full of misery,
because they have attained the highest perfection.”
Here Lord Sri Krishna clearly mentions
world is full of misery and sufferings.
Also Upanishads are based on this
concept only that world is full of sufferings.
Also Krishna says that the cause of suffering is desire
and Upanishads are also based on the concept that desires are the cause of your
sufferings and you have to become desireless.
So we come to know that there is no difference between Sanatan and
Buddhism. The main aim is same. They both are teaching the very same thing.
So Buddha was talking about Vedas only
but by a different method. Buddha was against rituals or karma kanda of Vedas and animal sacrifices. But his teachings match
with teachings of Vedanta and Upanishads which are most essential part of Vedas.
Buddhists chant Aum,the sacred
syllable and Sanskrit mantras.
Dalai Lama says that Hinduism is
mother of Buddhism and also he worshipped Shiv Lingam, the representation of Nirakara(formless)form
of Supreme.
Buddha also believed in concepts of
Rebirth,karma and soul.
Buddha’s first teacher as per pali
cannon scriptures was Alara Kalana ,specialist of Samkhya philosophy which is a
philosophy of Sanatan.
Buddha preached Ahimsa, Meditation,
Yoga,detachment and reunication. Krishna also teaches these.
Some scholars say that Buddha preached there
was no atman. But this is not true. In ‘The ātman and its negation-A
conceptual and chronological analysis of early Buddhist thought’, by Alexander Wynne, it is mentioned that:
‘Early
Upaniṣadic speculation
on the ātman was well known in early Buddhist circles, and determines the form
and content of some important early Buddhist teachings’.
So ultimately we can conclude that
there is no difference between Sanatan and Buddhism. Both are paths to achieve
Nirvana just methods are different.
I hope you found this blog
enlightening. Please feel free to suggest topics for our future blogs.
Thank you.
Comments
Post a Comment