Questions on BrahmKumaris philosophies

 

India has continued to be a land of philosophies from the very beginning, and these philosophies were often very contradicting in nature. Take the Charvak philosophy, for example. Even today, new philosophies are emerging in India, such as the Arya Samaj philosophy or the Brahma Kumaris philosophy.

 

However, there are certain philosophies that present themselves as Hindu in nature, incorporating many Hindu elements, but are not genuinely Hindu. These types of philosophies are sometimes not even considered philosophies; they are referred to as propaganda. One such example is the case of Jagatguru Rampal Ji, who is currently in jail. These  philosophies, which appears to resonate with many Hindus, goes directly against their traditions and does not align with Vedic teachings.

 

One of the notable instances is the Brahma Kumaris philosophy. This philosophy, liked by many Hindus, raises questions as it diverges from their traditions. It is important to note that this discussion is not intended to criticize the Brahma Kumaris organization or its social services, which are commendable in contributing to peace and society.

 

In questioning the philosophy, it's crucial to recognize that debates or  shastraarth were integral parts of Indian Spiritual wisdom. This is not an attack on their organization or social services, but rather an inquiry into their philosophical stance. If you find this blog challenging, please refrain from criticizing, as my intention is not to spread hate. As a bee visits different flowers without hating them, I invite you to take my questions and respond if you can. Let's foster understanding and avoid the spread of animosity between communities.

 

 

I have extensively researched their philosophy, listened to their spiritual leaders, and some of my friends are actively practicing within the organization. Based on these experiences, I am writing a blog about them.

They say:-

“There are four yugas -Satyuga, Treta Yuga, Dwapar Yuga and Kali Yuga each of 1250 years. After every 5000 years destruction takes place in the world and again creation of world takes place and same cycle follows.”

 

Now this is completely against the Vedic scriptures but now someone would even question the Vedic scriptures so let me tell you that dinosaurs existed 65 million years ago but for science not for Brahmkumaris because their world is just for 5000 year old. Also carbon dating suggests age of many things 50000 years ago. A fundamfenftal belief of their philosophy is shattered

 

 

They also say that:-

“Soul doesn’t exist in animals, it only exist in human beings.”

Then how do animals live and this fact goes completely against Bhagavad Gita,Vedas and Puranas. As per Vedic philosophies, depending on our Karma we take birth in higher and lower species such as animals. And consciousness in a body comes from soul. Without consciousness body is a dead body it becomes active due to soul. Actually soul is not right word for “Atma” in vedic philosophy but due to lack of words in English language I used it.

 

They also question the existence of Ramayana and Mahabharata and for that very reason I am questioning their philosophy. They say that their philosophy is only correct but I am here to question them.

 

They say that:-

“They say world is going to end soon”

In 1976 they claimed world is going to end, then in 2000 again and then again in 2012 now they claim it is going to end in 2036. They keep shifting their dates when it doesn’t end which proves that they are just making fool of people.

 

They say that :-

“Bhagavad Geeta narrated in Mahabharat is wrong/ false. Murali's written in Hindi is real/ authentic Geeta.”

 

It means that great acharayas like Adi Shankaracahrya,Madhavacharya,Ramanujcharya who gave their commentaries on Bhagavad Gita are fake and an organisation started in 1936 is correct.

According to their teachings, the importance of the purity of the soul is emphasized, suggesting that even in marriage, one should treat their spouse as a sister. However, a potential contradiction arises when considering the concept of procreation, as treating one's wife as a sister seems incompatible with the traditional Vedic view.

 

In Vedic philosophy, the emphasis is on treating one's spouse as divine, seeing God in them, and engaging in sexual relations for the purpose of continuing the lineage through the birth of a child rather than for mere sense gratification. From this perspective, the Vedic philosophy offers a vision that aligns with the sacred nature of marital relations and the purpose of family expansion.

 

 

 

 

They claim that saints won't help you reach your aim, but I strongly disagree. I've personally experienced the transformative power of saints in my life. They have played a pivotal role in turning me away from a tamasic state, freeing me from anxiety and depression through their grace. The guidance I've received in my spiritual journey has been solely due to the influence of saints.

 

In Vedic philosophy, saints are revered, often considered even greater than God. The significance lies in the belief that without the guidance of saints, it can be challenging to discern the path leading to the Supreme. Comparing it to learning physics, attempting to understand it on your own can be difficult, but with a master of physics as your guide, the process becomes much smoother. Similarly, saints provide guidance on the spiritual path, making it more accessible.

 

Without the presence of saints, who in society would uplift fallen souls and guide them towards a love for the divine? The role of saints is crucial in facilitating spiritual growth and connecting individuals with higher aspirations.

 

Many of my friends have expressed dissatisfaction with the answers provided by the Brahma Kumaris. Some might argue that practicing their meditation brings a sense of peace, but I believe this tranquility is a common result of focused meditation on any object. For instance, try closing your eyes, sitting for 5 minutes, and concentrating on a chair. Upon opening your eyes, you may feel a sense of bliss—this is a normal psychological response, not exclusive to a particular meditation technique.

 

True meditation goes beyond temporary feelings of peace during the practice. It extends into a state of lasting tranquility that persists even when meditation is not actively practiced. This enduring sense of blessing characterizes authentic meditation, which is far more profound than the initial calming effects.

 

Their philosophies goes totally against the Vedic scriptures and the people who call themselves Hindus and follow the Brahma Kumaris teaching are actually fake Hindus.  Because Hindu is a person who follows the teachings of the Vedas. But Brahmakumaris  are preaching what is against the Vedas. Its actually a cult. And the Hindus who follow their philosophy are the people who haven’t read Vedic scriptures, so I would advise these people to please go and read the scriptures.